From: Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (no striping)
Date: 27 May 2001 11:47:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m27kz39l8t.fsf@isnogud.escape.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105270747.f4R7lIYa005098@webber.adilger.int>; from Andreas Dilger on Sun, 27 May 2001 01:47:18 -0600 (MDT)
Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com> writes:
> /dev/vgtest/lvtest = real 66.909s user 0.440s sys 10.420 *** 5x as slow
> /dev/vgtest/lvtest = real 70.135s user 0.520s sys 11.390 *** 5x as slow
>
> /dev/vgtest3/lvtest = real 63.552s user 0.510s sys 10.290s *** 6x as slow
> /dev/vgtest3/lvtest = real 62.354s user 0.610s sys 10.020s *** 6x as slow
This is similar to the worst case numbers I have measured.
> I'm not sure if it is an SMP or SCSI issue, or what. Urs, do you also
> have an SMP system? Maybe there are locking slowdowns under SMP and
> not under UP?
No. It's a single Pentium II, 333MHz, kernel 2.4.3 with lvm-0.9.1_beta7
compiled without SMP support:
isnogud:urs$ grep SMP /usr/src/linux-2.4.3-ut/.config
# CONFIG_SMP is not set
The SCSI controller is an Adaptec AIC 7880 on an ASUS P2L97-S
mainboard (onboard). The SCSI disks are
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: DCAS-34330W Rev: S65A
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: IBM Model: DCAS-34330W Rev: S65A
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
Vendor: NEC Model: DSE2100S Rev: 0306
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
i.e. /dev/sda and /dev/sdb are UW-SCSI and /dev/sdc is a SCSI-2 disks.
> The problem is definitely more noticable on the SCSI disks, but at least
> on the IDE disk the increased wall-clock time is wholly accounted for
> by increased system time. On the SCSI disks, it would guess that "dd"
> is waiting for I/O completions under LVM, and not on the raw disk???
How could I check? And do you have an idea, why a file system on top
of such a slow LV is, if at all, only somewhat slower?
urs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-27 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-26 15:44 [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (no striping) Urs Thuermann
2001-02-26 20:39 ` Joe Thornber
2001-02-26 21:03 ` Jorg de Jong
2001-02-26 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2001-02-27 8:35 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-02-27 12:21 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-02-28 11:05 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-04-10 19:30 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-04-10 21:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-11 11:23 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-04-11 19:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-11 22:00 ` Terje Kvernes
2001-05-15 11:46 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-05-15 12:13 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-05-26 11:17 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-05-27 7:47 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-27 9:47 ` Urs Thuermann [this message]
2001-05-27 17:01 ` [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (counterexample) idsfa
2001-05-15 17:08 ` [linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (no striping) Andreas Dilger
2001-05-26 11:23 ` Urs Thuermann
2001-02-26 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-02-27 10:33 ` Urs Thuermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m27kz39l8t.fsf@isnogud.escape.de \
--to=urs@isnogud.escape.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox