Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 3Ware [OT] (was: Logical Volume max-size?)
Date: Mon Nov 19 13:06:02 2001	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ufawv0mlgtg.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Benjamin Scott's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:58:50 -0500 (EST)"

>>>>> "BS" == Benjamin Scott <bscott@ntisys.com> writes:

BS>   I ask because we have had success with their 6200 series as a
BS> mirrored drive controller, and have found 3Ware to be reasonably
BS> responsive.  We have not had the opportunity to try their RAID5
BS> offerings yet, and your comments certainly do not inspire
BS> confidence.

Why not?  The card works as advertised.  It supports RAID5.  It does
not do RAID5 very fast.  I wouldn't call it slow, but there are
controllers that do RAID5 faster, and software RAID5 will outperform
the card as well.  Since they publish performance numbers, all you
have to do is see if it's fast enough for you.

BS> I am wondering if it is an issue that can be corrected by, e.g., a
BS> firmware update, or if it is just a design flaw in the cards.

No design flaw; they were simply not originally designed to do RAID5.
People asked for it, so they implemented it.  The card just doesn't
have enough CPU horsepower to do everything at disk speed.  A 6810 is
still a great card for striping or mirroring and is quite cost
effective simply as a JBOD controller.

So BFD.  If you want blisteringly fast RAID5, buy a 7810 or a 7850.
You'll appreciate the 64-bit PCI anyway.

Anyway, this is all off topic and if this list didn't have a Reply-To:
set I wouldn't be replying here.  We do discuss this kind of thing on
linux-ide-arrays@lists.math.uh.edu.  It's run by Majordomo; send mail
to linux-ide-arrays-subscribe@lists.math.uh.edu to join.

 - J<

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-19 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-18  0:36 [linux-lvm] Logical Volume max-size? Petro
2001-11-18  0:47 ` mitch
2001-11-18  0:50 ` Sean Oh
2001-11-18  1:09   ` Petro
2001-11-18  1:14     ` Benjamin Reed
2001-11-18  1:34       ` Petro
2001-11-18 12:59       ` Jason L Tibbitts III
2001-11-19  3:55     ` Goetz Bock
2001-11-19  7:59       ` Jason L Tibbitts III
2001-11-19  8:25         ` Goetz Bock
2001-11-19 12:54           ` [linux-lvm] 3Ware [OT] (was: Logical Volume max-size?) Benjamin Scott
2001-11-19 13:02             ` Lars O. Grobe
2001-11-19 13:06             ` Jason L Tibbitts III [this message]
2001-11-19 13:13       ` [linux-lvm] Logical Volume max-size? Petro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ufawv0mlgtg.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu \
    --to=tibbs@math.uh.edu \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox