From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: References: <20040127001252.A21930@cs.mcgill.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM2 + Linux 2.6.1 questions Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Jan 27 03:17:02 2004 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Navindra Umanee writes: > M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd wrote: >> > 2) Why do I see, for example, a /dev/mapper/v01-home entry, >> > instead of /dev/v01/home, when running 'df' and 'mount'? I >> > see that /dev/mapper/v01/home symlinks to >> > /dev/mapper/v01-home, which must account for this, though I >> > thought that because I'd specified /dev/v01/home, that it'd >> > appear as such? Not that this really matters I suppose ;-) >>=20 >> I see the /dev/vg/link name. > > Mine shows /dev/mapper/vg-link too. I would definitely prefer > /dev/vg/link because at least it's not implementation dependent... but > I guess it's mostly an aesthetic thing. > > Any idea why yours is different? Different version of mount maybe? > Using mount-2.11z here... Same version here. It struck me that my /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts. Maybe that makes a difference. --=20 M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd mru@kth.se