Re: Add private syscalls to support NPTL

Finn Thain
2009-10-28T01:23:48Z

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:

> Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> ...
> > Geert, in case there'll be further changes in the NPTL patch, would
> > you like me submit full patch against original tree or only the
> > incremental difference?
>
> Ping.
>
> Geert, did you have a chance to look over the patch from Oct. 2 2009?
>
> I've done a lot of testing since then and TLS/NPTL support on
> m68k/ColdFire is now stable enough to have no unexpected failures on
> binutils, gcc, g++, libstdc++ and glibc testsuites.

Nice work. I'm looking forward to eglibc patches so I can build a current
toolchain.

I suppose you can't really backport to eglibc 2.10 until the siginfo
question is resolved. It appears from the list traffic that the consensus
is to adopt the generic struct layout here. Is that the solution that
you've used in testing? If so, can you send the patches you been testing?

Thanks,

Finn

>
> Thanks,
>
>