From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - Nicolas Pitre has a new email address Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:25:15 +0100 Message-ID: <10f740e81001080025s657d354fl49d5c49fb8d81294@mail.gmail.com> References: <1261595749-23531-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <1261595749-23531-3-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <1261595749-23531-4-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <1261595749-23531-5-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <10f740e81001032327p11009b58t8fdd1a67848e9fc8@mail.gmail.com> <10f740e81001032343r5f7b8066p327c2220d426e783@mail.gmail.com> <10f740e81001070919l214f5a2cn9d6f6c1422934a70@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:39005 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751970Ab0AHIZR (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:25:17 -0500 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so11665673ewy.21 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:25:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Schmitz Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 02:15, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> >> > I remember seeing this as well a long time ago, due to some >> >> > bug/misconfiguration. But that >> >> > got fixed. >> > >> > I'll dig through the mailbox ... >> >> BTW, IIRC there were also some issues with some version of binutils, >> but I never saw that problem. >> >> gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-21) >> GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.18.0.20080103 > > The 4.1.0 I built does not get past the compiler test now (miscompiles __weak). Indeed. > My copy of crosstool (0.43) combines 4.1.0 and 4.1.1 (the latest supported) with > binutils 2.16.1 ... I'll give 2.18 a try. > > 3.3.6 is built with 2.15 - the m68k crosstool 0.38 build script of Christian did > use 2.16. > > Probably no matter though - building 2.6.33 with my old cross compiler once I > had revived that from the failing disk (3.3.6/2.16) results in the same double > fault. > >> My binutils is 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 according to dpkg. > > 2.18.1~cvs20080103-0ubuntu1 ... what is the host binutils even used for? That's actually binutils-m68k-linux-gnu, built per instructions from RomanZ. >> > Can you send that kernel and the defconfig by PM please? >> >> Done. > > Thanks, testing ... yours does in fact boot on my ARAnyM setup. Compiling with > your .config results in the same error. OK, so it's your toolchain. >> > I tested one of the failing kernels on the real Falcon and it did spontaenously >> > reboot there (with no output) as well. >> >> Strange. > > Yep - I'll try to compile the last kernel version that worked for me to see what > the various cross compilers generate for that. 2.6.30-rc6 (botched git pull so > I'm not too positive it isn't 2.6.29-something) does in fact compile fine with > my old 3.3.6 cross-gcc as well as my newly built one. > > I'll verify that on the new tree, and start bisecting. Sigh. Good luck! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds