From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: m68k/for-2.6.34 Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:44:42 +0100 Message-ID: <10f740e81002060144l7850f81ftd516600c27a33c7c@mail.gmail.com> References: <10f740e81002011212t91a087bkeb77dac23f5676e0@mail.gmail.com> <4B6B33EC.9000102@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:51346 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754542Ab0BFJon (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Feb 2010 04:44:43 -0500 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so879456wwi.19 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:44:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B6B33EC.9000102@codesourcery.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Maxim Kuvyrkov , Greg Ungerer Cc: Linux/m68k , uClinux development list On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 21:54, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > On 2/1/10 11:12 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > ... >> >> Should I add the NPTL support for m68k and m68knommu, or shall I wait >> for 2.6.35? > > Notwithstanding the bias, I think you should merge the NPTL support. The > NPTL changes don't touch any of the existing functionality, they only add > the new syscalls, so the risk of breaking something is negligible. OK for me. Greg, OK for m68knommu, too? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds