From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Stehlik Subject: Re: debian kernel m68k patches for 2.6.29 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:56:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1239774966.20245.4.camel@petr> References: <20090326123822.GD8081@marenka.net> <10f740e80903260610k29f73c4ci76594f46881e17a5@mail.gmail.com> <10f740e80903290607y743bada9w829754722e9f7d9f@mail.gmail.com> <1239696787.2049.8.camel@petr> <1239698381.2049.25.camel@petr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Schmitz Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Stephen R Marenka , debian-68k@lists.debian.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Michael Schmitz p=ED=B9e v St 15. 04. 2009 v 03:25 +0200: > > BTW, does it mean that there is a problem with mounting small GEMDO= S > > partitions in Linux (<32 MB?)? And at the same time you can't mount > > larger partitions because of the logical sector size limit (>511 MB= )? >=20 > Small partitions I can mount as regular MSDOS FAT (-o atari=3Dno) onl= y, unless=20 > they are <32 MB (in which case it's a 16 bit FAT with few enough clus= ters to be=20 > treated as 16 bit FAT by the Atari FAT patch). I don't think I understand it. What if I created a disk image with 15, 31, 63, 127, 255 and 511 MB partitions and sent it to you? Would you please list what partition sizes are mountable with _and_ without the Atari FAT patch that we are discussing here? That could finally clear it up (for me at least). > What disk driver did you create these partitions with? HDDRIVER, so it should be fully AHDI compatible. Petr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html