From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH 15/21] m68k/scsi: gvp11 - Extract check_wd33c93()
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:00:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270371651-2584-16-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270371651-2584-15-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
---
drivers/scsi/gvp11.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/gvp11.c b/drivers/scsi/gvp11.c
index 5f07648..265cd27 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/gvp11.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/gvp11.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
#include <linux/stat.h>
+#define CHECK_WD33C93
+
static irqreturn_t gvp11_intr(int irq, void *data)
{
struct Scsi_Host *instance = data;
@@ -166,7 +168,85 @@ static void dma_stop(struct Scsi_Host *instance, struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt,
}
}
-#define CHECK_WD33C93
+static int __init check_wd33c93(gvp11_scsiregs *regs)
+{
+#ifdef CHECK_WD33C93
+ volatile unsigned char *sasr_3393, *scmd_3393;
+ unsigned char save_sasr;
+ unsigned char q, qq;
+
+ /*
+ * These darn GVP boards are a problem - it can be tough to tell
+ * whether or not they include a SCSI controller. This is the
+ * ultimate Yet-Another-GVP-Detection-Hack in that it actually
+ * probes for a WD33c93 chip: If we find one, it's extremely
+ * likely that this card supports SCSI, regardless of Product_
+ * Code, Board_Size, etc.
+ */
+
+ /* Get pointers to the presumed register locations and save contents */
+
+ sasr_3393 = ®s->SASR;
+ scmd_3393 = ®s->SCMD;
+ save_sasr = *sasr_3393;
+
+ /* First test the AuxStatus Reg */
+
+ q = *sasr_3393; /* read it */
+ if (q & 0x08) /* bit 3 should always be clear */
+ return -ENODEV;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_AUXILIARY_STATUS; /* setup indirect address */
+ if (*sasr_3393 == WD_AUXILIARY_STATUS) { /* shouldn't retain the write */
+ *sasr_3393 = save_sasr; /* Oops - restore this byte */
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ if (*sasr_3393 != q) { /* should still read the same */
+ *sasr_3393 = save_sasr; /* Oops - restore this byte */
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ if (*scmd_3393 != q) /* and so should the image at 0x1f */
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ /*
+ * Ok, we probably have a wd33c93, but let's check a few other places
+ * for good measure. Make sure that this works for both 'A and 'B
+ * chip versions.
+ */
+
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
+ q = *scmd_3393;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
+ *scmd_3393 = ~q;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
+ qq = *scmd_3393;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
+ *scmd_3393 = q;
+ if (qq != q) /* should be read only */
+ return -ENODEV;
+ *sasr_3393 = 0x1e; /* this register is unimplemented */
+ q = *scmd_3393;
+ *sasr_3393 = 0x1e;
+ *scmd_3393 = ~q;
+ *sasr_3393 = 0x1e;
+ qq = *scmd_3393;
+ *sasr_3393 = 0x1e;
+ *scmd_3393 = q;
+ if (qq != q || qq != 0xff) /* should be read only, all 1's */
+ return -ENODEV;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
+ q = *scmd_3393;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
+ *scmd_3393 = ~q;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
+ qq = *scmd_3393;
+ *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
+ *scmd_3393 = q;
+ if (qq != (~q & 0xff)) /* should be read/write */
+ return -ENODEV;
+#endif /* CHECK_WD33C93 */
+
+ return 0;
+}
int __init gvp11_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt)
{
@@ -180,11 +260,6 @@ int __init gvp11_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt)
gvp11_scsiregs *regs;
wd33c93_regs wdregs;
int num_gvp11 = 0;
-#ifdef CHECK_WD33C93
- volatile unsigned char *sasr_3393, *scmd_3393;
- unsigned char save_sasr;
- unsigned char q, qq;
-#endif
if (!MACH_IS_AMIGA || called)
return 0;
@@ -225,77 +300,9 @@ int __init gvp11_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt)
if (!request_mem_region(address, 256, "wd33c93"))
continue;
-#ifdef CHECK_WD33C93
-
- /*
- * These darn GVP boards are a problem - it can be tough to tell
- * whether or not they include a SCSI controller. This is the
- * ultimate Yet-Another-GVP-Detection-Hack in that it actually
- * probes for a WD33c93 chip: If we find one, it's extremely
- * likely that this card supports SCSI, regardless of Product_
- * Code, Board_Size, etc.
- */
-
- /* Get pointers to the presumed register locations and save contents */
-
- sasr_3393 = &(((gvp11_scsiregs *)(ZTWO_VADDR(address)))->SASR);
- scmd_3393 = &(((gvp11_scsiregs *)(ZTWO_VADDR(address)))->SCMD);
- save_sasr = *sasr_3393;
-
- /* First test the AuxStatus Reg */
-
- q = *sasr_3393; /* read it */
- if (q & 0x08) /* bit 3 should always be clear */
- goto release;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_AUXILIARY_STATUS; /* setup indirect address */
- if (*sasr_3393 == WD_AUXILIARY_STATUS) { /* shouldn't retain the write */
- *sasr_3393 = save_sasr; /* Oops - restore this byte */
- goto release;
- }
- if (*sasr_3393 != q) { /* should still read the same */
- *sasr_3393 = save_sasr; /* Oops - restore this byte */
- goto release;
- }
- if (*scmd_3393 != q) /* and so should the image at 0x1f */
- goto release;
-
- /*
- * Ok, we probably have a wd33c93, but let's check a few other places
- * for good measure. Make sure that this works for both 'A and 'B
- * chip versions.
- */
-
- *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
- q = *scmd_3393;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
- *scmd_3393 = ~q;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
- qq = *scmd_3393;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_SCSI_STATUS;
- *scmd_3393 = q;
- if (qq != q) /* should be read only */
- goto release;
- *sasr_3393 = 0x1e; /* this register is unimplemented */
- q = *scmd_3393;
- *sasr_3393 = 0x1e;
- *scmd_3393 = ~q;
- *sasr_3393 = 0x1e;
- qq = *scmd_3393;
- *sasr_3393 = 0x1e;
- *scmd_3393 = q;
- if (qq != q || qq != 0xff) /* should be read only, all 1's */
+ regs = (gvp11_scsiregs *)(ZTWO_VADDR(address));
+ if (check_wd33c93(regs))
goto release;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
- q = *scmd_3393;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
- *scmd_3393 = ~q;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
- qq = *scmd_3393;
- *sasr_3393 = WD_TIMEOUT_PERIOD;
- *scmd_3393 = q;
- if (qq != (~q & 0xff)) /* should be read/write */
- goto release;
-#endif
instance = scsi_register(tpnt, sizeof(struct WD33C93_hostdata));
if (instance == NULL)
@@ -310,7 +317,6 @@ int __init gvp11_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt)
else
hdata->dma_xfer_mask = default_dma_xfer_mask;
- regs = (gvp11_scsiregs *)(instance->base);
regs->secret2 = 1;
regs->secret1 = 0;
regs->secret3 = 15;
--
1.6.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-04 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-04 9:00 [PATCH 0/21] m68k/scsi: wd33c93 driver cleanups Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 01/21] scsi: wd33c93 - Kill empty wd33c93_release() Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 02/21] m68k/scsi: a2091 - Reindentation Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 03/21] m68k/scsi: gvp11 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 04/21] m68k/scsi: mvme147 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 05/21] m68k/scsi: a3000 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 06/21] m68k/scsi: a2091 - Use shost_priv() and kill ugly HDATA() macro Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 07/21] m68k/scsi: gvp11 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 08/21] m68k/scsi: mvme147 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 09/21] m68k/scsi: a3000 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 10/21] m68k/scsi: a2091 - Kill ugly DMA() macro Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 11/21] m68k/scsi: gvp11 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 12/21] m68k/scsi: a3000 " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 13/21] m68k/scsi: mvme147 - Kill static global mvme147_host Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 14/21] m68k/scsi: a3000 - Kill static global a3000_host Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 16/21] m68k/scsi: a2091 - Kill a2091_scsiregs typedef Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 17/21] m68k/scsi: gvp11 - Kill gvp11_scsiregs typedef Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 18/21] m68k/scsi: a3000 - Kill a3000_scsiregs typedef Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 19/21] m68k/scsi: mvme147 - Kill obsolete HOSTS_C logic Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 20/21] m68k: amiga - A2091/A590 SCSI zorro_driver conversion Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-04 9:00 ` [PATCH 21/21] m68k: amiga - GVP Series II " Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-05 6:25 ` [PATCH 10/21] m68k/scsi: a2091 - Kill ugly DMA() macro Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20100405062529.GA28950@infradead.org>
2010-04-05 19:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-23 8:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-23 8:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-23 8:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-04-23 10:15 ` [PATCH] SCSI: sgiwd93: remove use of legacy base field of host struct Ralf Baechle
2010-04-23 10:26 ` [PATCH] SCSI: sgiwd93: Convert to use shost_priv() Ralf Baechle
2010-05-02 20:05 ` [PATCH 10/21] m68k/scsi: a2091 - Kill ugly DMA() macro James Bottomley
2010-05-03 19:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-05-13 19:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270371651-2584-16-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox