From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>,
Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [m68k] partial success but does not boot: 3.2~rc7
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:53:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325462025.13595.189.camel@deadeye> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325460465.13595.179.camel@deadeye>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 23:27 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 21:16 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[...]
> > • work and fail
> >
> > This is for debian-68k, linux-68k and debian-kernel:
> >
> > ARAnyM “console” output of a working (3.0) and failing (3.2) boot,
> > for your debugging pleasure. I can run arbitrary tests against the
> > failing kernel, as long as they’re limited to [LILO].Args or make
> > it boot ;-)
>
> This is presumably triggered by enabling CPU topology information in
> sysfs on UP systems. This is a Debian patch for 3.2
> (features/all/topology-Provide-CPU-topology-in-sysfs-in-SMP-configura.patch) but has been accepted upstream for 3.3.
>
> My guess is that on m68k get_cpu_sysdev(0) returns NULL and thus
> topology_add_dev() passes an invalid pointer into sysfs_create_group().
> So either m68k (and maybe some other architectures with no SMP support)
> need to be fixed or the CPU topology code needs to allow for this.
None of these architectures appears to call register_cpu():
c6x frv h8300 m68k microblaze openrisc score um xtensa
and therefore they will all panic at boot following this change (commit
ccbc60d3e19a1b6ae66ca0d89b3da02dde62088b). So either I can try to fix
them or else it must be reverted for now.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Humour is the best antidote to reality.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-01 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-01 21:16 [m68k] partial success but does not boot: 3.2~rc7 Thorsten Glaser
2012-01-01 23:27 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-01-01 23:41 ` Thorsten Glaser
2012-01-01 23:53 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2012-01-08 17:57 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325462025.13595.189.camel@deadeye \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=debian-68k@lists.debian.org \
--cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tg@mirbsd.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox