From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Stehlik Subject: Re: new ARAnyM with better FPU Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:33:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1332354822.7194.4.camel@aspire> References: <1332282242.3352.7.camel@aspire> <1332322473.10247.56.camel@petr> <1332337279.5083.3.camel@aspire> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx.zln.cz ([188.246.101.4]:36073 "EHLO mx.zln.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752125Ab2CUSdt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:33:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org, Linux/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v Wed 21. 03. 2012 v 16:08 +0100: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 14:41, Petr Stehlik wro= te: > > I am wondering if it is worth backporting the libmpfr and making ne= w > > ARAnyM packages for 10.04 when the 12.04 is to be released in a mon= th. >=20 > Indeed, next month we'll all be forced into the new GUI generation... Actually we won't be forced into that. First, the 10.04 LTS is supporte= d till April next year so people can stay on it for another year. That's why I was wondering whether to backport the libmpfr or not. And second, we have several possibilities of not getting United :-) There's the Classic mode of Gnome Shell that is basically good old Gnom= e 2 (just rewritten to use newer libraries), then the new Gnome Shell wit= h some particular extensions can be used almost like a normal desktop (Linus and other reported) and at last but not least, the http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/ is maturing quickly! Petr