From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Subject: Re: Fix support for console port other than ttyS0 on mcf.c Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:57:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20090205155700.GO26064@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: <20090204201518.GH26064@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20090204202009.GI26064@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20090205152751.GL26064@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.17]:55846 "EHLO caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890AbZBEP5D (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:57:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux Kernel Development , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, uClinux list On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:53:50PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org handles m68k (with MMU) only. > uclinux-dev@uclinux.org handles m68knommu. Oh. I think I got confused by the fact the same arch/m68k/include is used for both. so I looked up m68k in MAINTAINERS. I will start bothering uclinux-dev@uclinux.org instead. So by uclinux driver you meant m68knommu uclinux driver. I was thinking uclibc for some reason. -- Len Sorensen