From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland McGrath Subject: Re: m68k ptrace code Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090510231826.930C5FC35D@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <20090427191230.GA1657@lst.de> <20090427191441.GC1657@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57328 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452AbZEJXSr (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 19:18:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Andreas Schwab's message of Sunday, 10 May 2009 21:32:29 +0200 Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Looks good to me, except you also want to nix PTRACE_KILL from your switch so the generic code handles it. Same goes for {PEEK,POKE}{DATA,TEXT} too. Also note that you have to define a PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK value in asm/ptrace.h (new request code in your ptrace syscall ABI) to make user_enable_block_step() get used by anything. Thanks, Roland