From: Lance Tagliapietra <lancetag@Luminet.net>
To: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Amiga RTC kernel config [was: Re: m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison]
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:02:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090515170208.GB1530@luminet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2octulnkv.fsf@igel.home>
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:31:12AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Lance Tagliapietra <lancetag@Luminet.net> writes:
>
> > Now, there is a /dev/rtc device of type 10 135. Interestingly, though is that the
> > kernel is looking for an "rtc0" device based on the kernel config. So I'll make
> > that change to the kernel config and re-build and see what I get -- or would it
> > be a better approach to add a /dev/rtc0 c 10 135?
>
> I think you need a c 254 0 device if you use rtc-generic.
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I beleive I made a mistake here. I compiled my kernel (and the other 2.6.xx
kernels I have tried) were compiled with CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y instead of
CONFIG_GEN_RTC=Y and CONFIG_GEN_RTC_X=y which I have now determined are the
defaults for the m68k arch, and also the options used in my properly working
2.4.30 kernel.
That is why the "/dev/rtc0" showed up in the .config.
I am re-building my kernel to test.
Thanks,
--Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-15 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-03 7:28 m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-03 11:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-05-15 2:37 ` Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-15 9:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-05-15 9:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-05-15 17:02 ` Lance Tagliapietra [this message]
2009-05-15 20:05 ` Amiga RTC kernel config [was: Re: m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison] Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-06 6:44 ` m68k 2.6.26-1 vs 2.4.30 comparison Kolbjørn Barmen
2009-05-06 17:45 ` Lance Tagliapietra
2009-05-07 2:37 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090515170208.GB1530@luminet.net \
--to=lancetag@luminet.net \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox