Re: m68k ptrace code

Andreas Schwab
2009-08-05T21:12:35Z

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:32:05AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> > Looks good to me, except you also want to nix PTRACE_KILL from your switch
>> > so the generic code handles it. Same goes for {PEEK,POKE}{DATA,TEXT} too.
>> > Also note that you have to define a PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK value in
>> > asm/ptrace.h (new request code in your ptrace syscall ABI) to make
>> > user_enable_block_step() get used by anything.
>>
>> Thanks for your comments. I have made these changes and verified with
>> the ptrace testsuite that the singleblock request works correctly.
>> There are a few failures in the testsuite, which I haven't analyzed yet,
>> but none are regressions.
>
> Any reason why this has never been commited?

Looks like Geert has a big backlog.