public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>
To: fthain@telegraphics.com.au
Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: initcall question
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:24:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022192436.GA7969@cynthia.pants.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0910222357390.22095@nippy.intranet>

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:56:50AM +1100, fthain@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
> If the platform devices are statically defined, they get no release method 
> which can result in the driver core carping, "Device 'scc.0' does not have 
> a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed", and then dumping a 
> backtrace.
> 
> The alternative to statically defined devices is platform_device_alloc(), 
> which does provide a release method, but I can't call it at arch_initcall 
> time because the console_initcall has already happened. And I can't use it 
> at setup_arch() time (when the boot info is parsed) because there's no 
> kmalloc() yet.
> 
> What to do? I don't want to export the bootinfo data to the pmac_zilog 
> driver for console initialisation. And I'd really like to avoid a bunch of 
> hard coded SCC base addresses.
> 
> Any suggestions?

Could you just define and set a release function that does nothing? That's
kind of silly, but it seems like it should work. If it's static memory
anyway, there isn't anything to free.

	Brad Boyer
	flar@allandria.com

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-22 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 13:56 initcall question fthain
2009-10-22 19:24 ` Brad Boyer [this message]
2009-10-23 16:30   ` fthain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091022192436.GA7969@cynthia.pants.nu \
    --to=flar@allandria.com \
    --cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox