From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keys: KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT needs TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME architecture support Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:49:09 -0800 Message-ID: <20091213234909.GA10609@cynthia.pants.nu> References: <21796.1260743776@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [76.245.85.235] ([76.245.85.235]:36154 "EHLO cynthia.pants.nu" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752644AbZLMXtn (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:49:43 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21796.1260743776@redhat.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: David Howells Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , James Morris , Linux/m68k , Mike Frysinger , Chris Zankel , Linux Kernel Development , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:36:16PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > +#warning TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME not implemented > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > I wonder if it should printk() too. I would think something like WARN_ONCE() or something rate limited would be more appropriate. Brad Boyer flar@allandria.com