From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH] zorro: BKL removal Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:39:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20100605203954.GD5368@nowhere> References: <20100605194149.GC5368@nowhere> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:34903 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932163Ab0FEUj7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:39:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux/m68k , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel Development On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 10:03:33PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 21:41, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 09:23:01PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Remove BKL use from proc_bus_zorro_lseek(), like was done for > >> proc_bus_pci_lseek() a long time ago. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > >> --- > > Cool. > > > > I suspect you'll queue it in your tree? Or should I? > > I'll queue it for 2.6.36. > > But I don't mind you to take it if you want to do something earlier... It's ok you can take it. I prefer that maintainers take these bkl works when possible, as they better know the code.