Re: aranym bug, manifests as "ida_remove called for id=13" on recent kernels

Al Viro
2010-10-11T04:48:11Z

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 09:36:32PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:

> I presume the bug is that foo put the return value in %d0 while bar
> should have its return value in %a0. This function isn't eligible
> for the optimization being used due to this need to move the result
> into a different register.

Yes.

> > Spot the obvious bug... BTW, why on the Earth does debian-ports m68k tree
> > use gcc-4.3 with Cthulhu-scaring 700Kb gzipped patch and does *not* have
> > gcc-4.4?
>
> I believe that gcc-4.4 for m68k is being held up by the TLS support patches.
> While I haven't been personally involved to any great degree, I got the
> impression that the work is pretty much done other than getting it included.

What do autobuilders use, BTW?