From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe De Muyter Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] m68k: merge mmu and non-mmu versions of muldi3 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:38:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20110420103802.GA26891@frolo.macqel> References: <1303278880-16153-1-git-send-email-gerg@snapgear.com> <1303278880-16153-2-git-send-email-gerg@snapgear.com> <1303278880-16153-3-git-send-email-gerg@snapgear.com> <20110420080609.GA24244@merkur.ravnborg.org> <20110420091216.GB3296@frolo.macqel> <4DAEA7F5.6080603@snapgear.com> <20110420095529.GC3296@frolo.macqel> <4DAEB2E1.6050404@snapgear.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailrelay007.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.173]:24550 "EHLO mailrelay007.isp.belgacom.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752095Ab1DTKiJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:38:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DAEB2E1.6050404@snapgear.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Ungerer Cc: uClinux development list , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Greg Ungerer Hi Greg, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:18:09PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: >> >> The 68340 has it also. (And I have an old linux port for this processor) > > That is just a SoC that contains a 68020 though, so __mc68020__ would > be defined for that. No, this is a cpu32 core, which is a subset of a 68020, so gcc does not define __mc68020__, or at least should not (there are old bug reports about that). > > >> I surmise the 68360 has it also. > > I believe that is a SoC with a 68040 cpu core, so I would expect that > __mc68040__ would be correct for that. This is a cpu32+ core. Same here. Not that it is that important now :) Philippe