public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@googlemail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>,
	Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Debian kernel 2.6.38-5
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:00:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110510070002.GA32329@chumley.earth.sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinP_U1c+X_zVrT1zXdzVh_p=STP0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:49:45AM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Christian,
> 
> 
> > I applied the following patch and it works! apt-get update that is, there is
> > no sshd on this freshly installed system yet...
> >
> > I also changed this line to have 4 underscores at the beginning:
> >
> >        { 0xec940559, "____alloc_ei_netdev" },
> 
> Where does that appear? Can't find it in drivers/net anywhere.

It's in zorro8390.mod.c, but *.mod.c is listed in .gitignore, so it must be
a remnant of my experiments with git and older branches. I wonder why it has
been compiled, though, I did not change any of the Makefiles.
 
> > it does not show up in git diff, so I am not sure if this is a leftover from
> > a previous checkout, or if it is also needed. And if it is needed, if it
> > should be two underscores or four or none, and if so why or why not...
> > Looking at the other drivers, there does not seem to be a lot of consistency?
> 
> ____alloc_ei_netdev is the function defined in lib8390.c which is
> called by the individual drivers from their respective
> __alloc_ei_netdev().
> 
> The only symbol exported by zorro8390.c should be __alloc_ei_netdev -
> if your above change was done in some symbol exports file it should
> probably have been left at __alloc_ei_netdev.

I did none of that, but to be sure, I should build another kernel with
Geert's patch on a clean checkout. 

I installed a few packages, rebooted to check if the network is set up
automatically (it is!), and installed more packages. Now I am upgrading
some more and I see reasonable download speeds: 140kB/s. However, I also saw
this flying by:

eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x0 imr=0x0.

Three times in about one minute. The whole system is a bit more responsive
now (I an log in on a second console without a long delay). I could not log
in with ssh yet, though I get a little bit further than yesterday, there is
some response already from the remote system.

Christian

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-10  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-23 18:00 Debian kernel v2.6.38 (was: Re: Fix for SLUB?) Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-23 18:13 ` Debian kernel v2.6.38 Thorsten Glaser
2011-04-23 19:19   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-23 19:58     ` Thorsten Glaser
2011-04-23 22:12     ` Michael Schmitz
2011-04-24  8:18       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-24 11:37         ` Thorsten Glaser
2011-04-25  2:36           ` Michael Schmitz
2011-04-25 14:19             ` Thorsten Glaser
2011-04-25  1:33     ` Thorsten Glaser
2011-04-24 16:18   ` Finn Thain
2011-04-25  2:48     ` Michael Schmitz
2011-04-25  3:53       ` Finn Thain
2011-04-29 23:44         ` Michael Schmitz
2011-05-08 12:58 ` Debian kernel 2.6.38-5 Thorsten Glaser
2011-05-08 16:59   ` Christian T. Steigies
2011-05-08 18:00     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-08 18:49       ` Thorsten Glaser
2011-05-08 19:26         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-08 18:40     ` Thorsten Glaser
2011-05-08 20:08       ` Christian T. Steigies
2011-05-08 20:22         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-08 20:58         ` Michael Schmitz
2011-05-08 21:45           ` Christian T. Steigies
2011-05-08 21:30         ` Thorsten Glaser
2011-05-08 23:14         ` Finn Thain
2011-05-09  7:16           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-09 20:25             ` Christian T. Steigies
2011-05-09 22:49               ` Michael Schmitz
2011-05-10  7:00                 ` Christian T. Steigies [this message]
2011-05-10  7:38                   ` Michael Schmitz
2011-05-09 20:28           ` zorro8390 (was: Re: Debian kernel 2.6.38-5) Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-10  9:01           ` Debian kernel 2.6.38-5 Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-10 11:57             ` Finn Thain
2011-05-10 12:06               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-08 20:53   ` Michael Schmitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110510070002.GA32329@chumley.earth.sol \
    --to=cts@debian.org \
    --cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schmitzmic@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tg@mirbsd.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox