From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe De Muyter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:02:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20120823160255.GA32671@frolo.macqel> References: <1345551531-15348-1-git-send-email-stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Stany MARCEL Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL > > wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL > >> --- > >> > >> This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25. > >> > >> Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head > >> 2 FEC configured with shared phy > >> > >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +- > >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go > > through the netdev tree, or collect acks there. > > > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > > > Geert > > > > Hello Geert, > > Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ? Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log. AFAIK the phy interface is standardized. Philippe