Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available

Thierry Reding
2012-09-18T08:00:37Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1017 bytes --]

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least
> > one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get.
> > Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances it
> > makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree.
>
> Ok, I've merged it but there was no indication in the patch that it was
> supposed to be a fix... there's no cc: to stable. Does it need to go to
> stable? When was this brokenness introduced? What's the story for the
> m68k bit?

What tree is this supposed to go through? I've checked your ARM tree as
well as Mike's clock tree but neither seem to carry this patch. The
reason I ask is because I want to take a patch series that converts the
Unicore32 PWM code to the PWM framework into linux-next but it depends
on this patch as well.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]