From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:31:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20120915213151.GM12245@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1347202862-1617-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20120909235059.GA2643@sirena.org.uk> <20120910001524.GL13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120910002020.GB16249@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120910003913.GM13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <504F4E36.20309@metafoo.de> <1347375033.27206.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <504FE633.2090304@snapgear.com> <5050F3DB.1050202@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5050F3DB.1050202@metafoo.de> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Greg Ungerer , dedekind1@gmail.com, Mark Brown , Mike Turquette , Greg Ungerer , Julia Lawall , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least > one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get. > Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances it > makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree. Ok, I've merged it but there was no indication in the patch that it was supposed to be a fix... there's no cc: to stable. Does it need to go to stable? When was this brokenness introduced? What's the story for the m68k bit? (Cc on this thread to stable added so they can hear the reply... so if it does end up with a Cc: being added to the commit, they have the background... this is *not* a stable submission request.)