From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Alex Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
gnurou@gmail.com, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] gpio: introduce descriptor-based interface
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:46:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301141046.12976.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F3DC2B.6000603@nvidia.com>
On Monday 14 January 2013, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 07:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I found two that provide the generic gpio interfaces when gpiolib
> > is disabled, but use gpiolib otherwise for the same hardware,
> > arch/m68k/include/asm/mcfgpio.h and arch/blackfin/include/asm/gpio.h.
> > I would assume that we can simply remove the non-gpiolib shortcut
> > here at cost of a small overhead.
>
> I performed a search on my side too (checking configurations options
> which select GENERIC_GPIO but not ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB) and found the
> same list. This takes some time btw - many platforms use this combo to
> make GPIO support optional. Can I ask how you figured out these two archs?
I basically grepped for GENERIC_GPIO and looked at
the individual implementations.
> > Then there are a bunch that use gpiolib but have a nontrivial
> > implementation of gpio_get_value and other functions. I'm not sure
> > if these are a problematic with your code.
>
> AFAICT these all implement an inline path that bypasses GPIOlib when the
> GPIO number is known at compile time, for faster bitbanging I presume.
> It should be totally harmless to keep them. Unfortunately, I don't think
> it would be possible to have a similar trick using handlers.
Right, makes sense.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-14 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1357629535-26033-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <201301091046.13020.arnd@arndb.de>
[not found] ` <2270940.DTxEYMZtED@percival>
[not found] ` <201301101008.45091.arnd@arndb.de>
2013-01-14 10:21 ` [PATCH 0/4] gpio: introduce descriptor-based interface Alex Courbot
[not found] ` <50F3DC2B.6000603@nvidia.com>
2013-01-14 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301141046.12976.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox