From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wouter Verhelst Subject: Re: gcc possibly generating invalid assembler Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:38:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20170419083828.cs5voxoczxibwb5f@grep.be> References: <5db978c6-15ce-c60e-d350-f9e87154e0b2@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20170414073651.bwpg7plhfz23v24b@grep.be> <20170419073938.235okxaw2e4rw3ev@grep.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from latin.grep.be ([46.4.76.168]:51549 "EHLO latin.grep.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933431AbdDSIio (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:38:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170419073938.235okxaw2e4rw3ev@grep.be> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: Debian m68k , Linux/m68k On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:39:38AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > due to lack of pthread support, or the optimization level. Feels like > someone failed to read the automake documentation properly (CFLAGS is > supposed to remain unset; and indeed checking out configure.ac reveals > some CFLAGS munging that shouldn't happen). Filed https://bugs.lttng.org/issues/1095 about that issue. Haven't filed a bug report about the optimizer bug yet. -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules, and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too. -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12