From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C48EC07E96 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B10961879 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229541AbhGHEbC (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 00:31:02 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39135 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229482AbhGHEbC (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 00:31:02 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id F001668C4E; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 06:28:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 06:28:18 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Schmitz , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] m68k: remove get_fs()/set_fs() Message-ID: <20210708042818.GA17672@lst.de> References: <1625708899-29013-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 07:51:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So maybe it could be > > typedef struct { > unsigned char val:3; > } function_code_reg_t; > > or something like that. > > I suspect some real m68k person should make up the name, not me. The > alternate function code registers are all from after my time ;) I think the typedef is a little pointless that is why I dropped it entirely (mm_segment_t should go away entirely anyway). We could reduce the storage space for it, but that always requireѕ changing inline assembly, so I'd rather let a real m68k person do it if they care.