From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: treat char as always unsigned
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:19:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221221171922.GA2470607@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wj7FMFLr9AOW9Aa9ZMt1-Lu01_X8vLiaKosPyF2H-+ujA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:06:41AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > The above assumes an unsigned char as input to strcmp(). I consider that
> > a hypothetical problem because "comparing" strings with upper bits
> > set doesn't really make sense in practice (How does one compare Günter
> > against Gunter ? And how about Gǖnter ?). On the other side, the problem
> > observed here is real and immediate.
>
> POSIX does actually specify "Günter" vs "Gunter".
>
> The way strcmp is supposed to work is to return the sign of the
> difference between the byte values ("unsigned char").
>
> But that sign has to be computed in 'int', not in 'signed char'.
>
> So yes, the m68k implementation is broken regardless, but with a
> signed char it just happened to work for the US-ASCII case that the
> crypto case tested.
>
I understand. I just prefer a known limited breakage to completely
broken code.
> I think the real fix is to just remove that broken implementation
> entirely, and rely on the generic one.
Perfectly fine with me.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-21 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Y1BcpXAjR4tmV6RQ@zx2c4.com>
[not found] ` <20221019203034.3795710-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
2022-12-21 14:53 ` [PATCH v2] kbuild: treat char as always unsigned Guenter Roeck
2022-12-21 15:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-21 15:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-21 15:29 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-12-21 15:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-21 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-21 17:19 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2022-12-21 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-21 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-21 21:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-22 13:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-22 10:41 ` David Laight
[not found] ` <f02e0ac7f2d805020a7ba66803aaff3e31b5eeff.camel@t-online.de>
2022-12-24 9:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-30 11:39 ` David Laight
2022-12-30 13:13 ` David Laight
2023-01-02 8:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-21 17:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2022-12-21 16:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221221171922.GA2470607@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox