From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F12D5464D for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2025 03:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766892903; cv=none; b=jnFkTYCvdRTiO2Mm0Xvu+C8FTR7UXboVErYmtv+zspvH7U6OZc8G2yUXraIGOttnS0rdxhwyYdnju34hEYjGTV9wDiQaXBempi9ikd71up67suqEwFPCLKbbUSA7d+lXWWU5JolVRlzSIX78EkMxQylCxULDErsJ+Ib1i4+OT5U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766892903; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GuIC3bFkkJdvl1CpVIB6XPzQzDS3rWf2teTVlwCsumk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=AqIHFBLFqZ7E7k9CEMMn8UHnttxFgrVId3y/TPmwFhZqa07stmN9wQgTC1+fN4/i4AIcQcrxMKb9QoywS+mXRXdVRTwsiaQho+IMIzmvLiqWx/ZEzASxRQ84eBZJyfD0fdREEYB6x2imo0YfCFG0z2eH1gzAUyXkECKaWuxFrRM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bMwIZITD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bMwIZITD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766892902; x=1798428902; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=GuIC3bFkkJdvl1CpVIB6XPzQzDS3rWf2teTVlwCsumk=; b=bMwIZITDVLmEAji3QIF2mIdspuCczfw9lSt9A0bBRTd4dg1VeoVVHSzZ gXJ8kovzGsdmK9KLP1N6GRiTBKF9YjphCbn2FoinOsSGHeorABgp3APJ0 AeOwNDpF2+eSKSSqJ1Epw5Eklhmt63unw1fjRbIOxD/zT9p/2f2Zny0Gt T8BhMnSYFstKZvrtFwrKpPRjnXHNSSvGOOed+hFWKGZ3fdaljOuXhqo9h EWWnA5NGPDPtSz/PKadytpwkOF1A8tOs1e0xmHQavrgzHsBM6T8hts1qK 7er96ZmiQa7gU4JRBm/FJvy+akD3I7sURBxy1Z+p4BrKsQGsPt0t3QLLZ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: n6iYhlPsS5qV3+CD+TKsSA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OJgJUvehS7SObCq8LAJKlQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11654"; a="85982635" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,182,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="85982635" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Dec 2025 19:34:59 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: q8XkMzQJRyeii4tuPLryWg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CFwf+CXMQ0WSdaXFU0lYsA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,182,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="201577753" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO dd3453e2b682) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2025 19:34:57 -0800 Received: from kbuild by dd3453e2b682 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vZhYU-000000006En-3xiG; Sun, 28 Dec 2025 03:34:54 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 11:34:44 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Greg Ungerer Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org Subject: [gerg-m68knommu:armnommu 3/3] include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry) is wrong, expected 3" Message-ID: <202512281116.S91ii66Y-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gerg/m68knommu.git armnommu head: edf19f0aab57e81f4391d800d6845527413ca77b commit: edf19f0aab57e81f4391d800d6845527413ca77b [3/3] ARM: versatile: support configuring versatile machine for no-MMU config: arm-randconfig-r072-20251228 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251228/202512281116.S91ii66Y-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251228/202512281116.S91ii66Y-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512281116.S91ii66Y-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/bitfield.h:10, from include/linux/fortify-string.h:5, from include/linux/string.h:386, from include/linux/uuid.h:11, from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:10, from fs/xfs/xfs.h:26, from fs/xfs/xfs_super.c:7: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h: In function 'xfs_check_ondisk_structs': >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry) is wrong, expected 3" #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:2: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' static_assert(sizeof(structname) == (size), \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:137:2: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE' XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry, 3); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_dir2_data_unused) is wrong, expected 6" #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:2: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' static_assert(sizeof(structname) == (size), \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:140:2: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE' XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_dir2_data_unused, 6); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +78 include/linux/build_bug.h bc6245e5efd70c Ian Abbott 2017-07-10 60 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 61 /** 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 62 * static_assert - check integer constant expression at build time 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 63 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 64 * static_assert() is a wrapper for the C11 _Static_assert, with a 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 65 * little macro magic to make the message optional (defaulting to the 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 66 * stringification of the tested expression). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 67 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 68 * Contrary to BUILD_BUG_ON(), static_assert() can be used at global 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 69 * scope, but requires the expression to be an integer constant 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 70 * expression (i.e., it is not enough that __builtin_constant_p() is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 71 * true for expr). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 72 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 73 * Also note that BUILD_BUG_ON() fails the build if the condition is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 74 * true, while static_assert() fails the build if the expression is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 75 * false. 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 76 */ 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 77 #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 @78 #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 79 07a368b3f55a79 Maxim Levitsky 2022-10-25 80 :::::: The code at line 78 was first introduced by commit :::::: 6bab69c65013bed5fce9f101a64a84d0385b3946 build_bug.h: add wrapper for _Static_assert :::::: TO: Rasmus Villemoes :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki