Re: Plan needed for switching m68k to 32-bit alignment

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>]

On Mon, 2024-10-28 at 19:49 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > Here is the current top of the list of packages that won't build on m68k 
> > because of the 2-byte alignment issue:
> > 
> >    2814 cargo:m68k
> >     900 ghc:m68k
> >     261 gccgo-14:m68k
> >     241 libqt5core5a:m68k
> >     181 architecture-is-64-bit:m68k
> >     117 libglib2.0-0:m68k
> >      81 libcompiler-libs-ocaml-dev-0a396:m68k
> >      81 golang-go:m68k
> >      71 wx3.2-headers:m68k
> >      57 qt6-base-dev:m68k
> >      57 python3:m68k
> >      46 libamd2:m68k
> > 
> > Are you going to fix these for me?
> > 
> 
> Are you the only user?

I am the one who does all the work on Debian/m68k.

> Seriously though, thanks for providing data. Now, if you would link to the 
> upstream refusals for CPython and golang, I'll do what I can to help.

I honestly don't have to justify myself towards you. I will use the Christmas
holidays to make a decision. I will either drop the m68k port from Debian or
just perform a forced switch.

I don't care anymore what you're posting here. You're just wasting my time.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913