From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1E4C32793 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229564AbjARWVj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:21:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34080 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229446AbjARWVg (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:21:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3917264682 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id c6so525513pls.4 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:21:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XX04lWxahMaP+N40uHcgjtrzC/2DFsBx0hwGwKtF2A8=; b=l3YwVqfhamV7XIrChsR00QVq/1DWqs8StR92RtJjRHNzb2F0Co/DwwJ+MWuuKvIGip kebc/DGVF9sKIAl+YoPU/Wq8L3fQbYhRitKsv/3GNo5gPK8cUZxlsAO001eV788MJHbb e/xbdE44TgxysWoKs3s1dt2A6pUsr4kfF2UB6ZzbvtQ/OKwHN3iIze/UcAyIrdxoepTN vyASwODFidXajf3BkHHoHCo+D8YX0+kpDK36YAgcZFrn1NtSRe5+Ns4MEGTlreIIpE22 lt3nQBW8gak5e2wj8iBHg9D9MbsR/H6vfwUPQ7EYwxLaTy26yB0OQLxLbanKdh5QfbBh PZKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XX04lWxahMaP+N40uHcgjtrzC/2DFsBx0hwGwKtF2A8=; b=ZlN7E/ya0GbJakcbEzKs9pfS3XLHfzFkFu1Nhx0N881BzXB/YhoLN2s/WjCO6Cxwbj 3NKYAqywMSt1WWfvPmx+eKIVTwHmI3qLWpKwtt6k8T4NVh+lMV7ugKuygfW4OzFI84AJ TH7fkFUH6SW6gUKdBQy01PxusUGQsEQJecLy4/il5rFQcJEHdrtt5FYA181sITVJJXQX T80Kdm6LRGfA6pP4QMV0/+4MATMnu83e7q0TZ/1s7uZWHqZtzTIIz25N5NzYtUMsWmlz jX6Zw7M+vJ89odV1fNC4QeM20r+LEiI1JsCXdBPQgkzG4PJrlKSW8XkQE2acjOxkhLz6 sZjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2ko1l5ks+WhxBqIMsQF7P3h9v5QAZqVRwY7njmE/8/OpxejGA6ku nu88ZFlOG3IwhaY2hO5l5mTwaCPfxtE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXv1BknvaLz3cARylZREK3KrI7xqjhV5bqmgkV/W+OM2eOIAPUSODfTdLEs9sFYVnmpS3IRheA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2b85:b0:229:2d61:e419 with SMTP id u5-20020a17090a2b8500b002292d61e419mr8328562pjd.14.1674080495709; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:df0:0:200c:113f:d4b9:7ba1:906c? ([2001:df0:0:200c:113f:d4b9:7ba1:906c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o10-20020a17090aac0a00b002291295fc2dsm1844877pjq.17.2023.01.18.14.21.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:21:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b3a641c-003f-6485-a1c1-0e0fdd45d23b@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:21:30 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/3] Add kernel seccomp support for m68k Content-Language: en-US To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, Michael Karcher , Andreas Schwab , Al Viro References: <20230112035529.13521-1-schmitzmic@gmail.com> <0687610a-0efd-51f5-110d-fad0de113556@physik.fu-berlin.de> <38518fa1-a584-6e9e-5160-a6922730e8f5@gmail.com> <6eab0d17-8928-212b-740c-6db249f79838@physik.fu-berlin.de> <10371c02-c54b-fa3e-2729-12d524685652@gmail.com> <739413f9-0425-59d9-b6a5-fe225f56cf78@gmail.com> From: Michael Schmitz In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Hi Adrian, On 18/01/23 22:43, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Michael! > > On 1/18/23 09:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> Good catch, thank you! I added the missing definitions and it builds >> fine now. >> >> Will test against a kernel with your patches now. > > libseccomp testsuite now fully passes on m68k, see attached. Great - you haven't had a chance to compile the kernel selftest suite for seccomp though? I wonder whether some of the 'architecture difference' skipped tests are related to the remaining seccomp_bpf self test faults?? > > @Geert: Any chance you can approve the seccomp patches? Now that we have m68k support for libseccomp, getting this merged is no longer purely academic. Both Al Viro and Andreas Schwab had provided feedback and improvements - could you perhaps review the latest version again (v13) if that's what is holding this up? Cheers,     Michael > > Thanks, > Adrian >