From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Kuvyrkov Subject: Re: Add private syscalls to support NPTL Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:01:11 +0300 Message-ID: <4AE5B9B7.7000106@codesourcery.com> References: <4A89D037.7090807@codesourcery.com> <4A8A54F9.3080100@codesourcery.com> <4A8A6CA2.4040806@codesourcery.com> <10f740e80908180222p4d95b19bp3069e037a6bc590e@mail.gmail.com> <4A91A4C8.5040803@codesourcery.com> <4A943ECC.80607@codesourcery.com> <4A97B69F.4000306@codesourcery.com> <4AC5CF12.8000200@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:51079 "EHLO mail.codesourcery.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752423AbZJZPBO (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:01:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AC5CF12.8000200@codesourcery.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Andreas Schwab , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: ... > Geert, in case there'll be further changes in the NPTL patch, would you > like me submit full patch against original tree or only the incremental > difference? Ping. Geert, did you have a chance to look over the patch from Oct. 2 2009? I've done a lot of testing since then and TLS/NPTL support on m68k/ColdFire is now stable enough to have no unexpected failures on binutils, gcc, g++, libstdc++ and glibc testsuites. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov CodeSourcery maxim@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x724