From: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add private syscalls to support NPTL
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:54:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE7EAC2.8050409@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.0910281209160.394@silk.local>
Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
>> Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> ...
>>> Geert, in case there'll be further changes in the NPTL patch, would
>>> you like me submit full patch against original tree or only the
>>> incremental difference?
>> Ping.
>>
>> Geert, did you have a chance to look over the patch from Oct. 2 2009?
>>
>> I've done a lot of testing since then and TLS/NPTL support on
>> m68k/ColdFire is now stable enough to have no unexpected failures on
>> binutils, gcc, g++, libstdc++ and glibc testsuites.
>
> Nice work. I'm looking forward to eglibc patches so I can build a current
> toolchain.
We [CodeSourcery] have just updated all of our toolchains, and the
GNU/Linux toolchain is based on EGLIBC 2.10 and has well tested TLS/NPTL
support. If you are targeting ColdFire you can simply download the
toolchain at <http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/coldfire>.
> I suppose you can't really backport to eglibc 2.10 until the siginfo
> question is resolved. It appears from the list traffic that the consensus
> is to adopt the generic struct layout here. Is that the solution that
> you've used in testing?
I'm not sure if any parts of the m68k kernel port depend on the custom
layout of siginfo, so I've only fixed the pieces which I'm sure are
wrong. I.e, I've been testing with this
<http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=125447365311948&w=2> patch.
> If so, can you send the patches you been testing?
All the patches are in the mailing lists.
The kernel patches are at
http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=125447760017098&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=125447365311948&w=2
The [E]GLIBC patches are at
[M68K/ColdFire patch 1/n] Update sysdep.h
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-08/msg00006.html
[M68K/ColdFire patch 2/n] Add CFI information to dl-trampoline.S
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-08/msg00007.html
[M68K/ColdFire patch 3/n] Update jmpbuf-unwind.h
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-08/msg00008.html
[M68K/ColdFire patch 4/n] Remove kernel headers
Update by hand to match your kernel
[M68K/ColdFire patch 5/n] Main NPTL patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-10/msg00006.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-10/msg00030.html
[M68K/ColdFire patch 6/n] Add TLS relocations to elf/elf.h
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-08/msg00012.html
Should I post this one to glibc-alpha@ for the review?
[M68K/ColdFire patch 7/n] Handle libgcc_s.so.2
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4457
Let me know if you find any particular problems with these patches.
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
CodeSourcery
maxim@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x724
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 21:48 Add private syscalls to support NPTL Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-17 22:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-08-18 7:15 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-18 8:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-08-18 8:56 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-18 9:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-08-18 9:36 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-18 18:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-08-23 20:21 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-25 19:43 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-28 10:51 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-10-02 9:59 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-10-26 15:01 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-10-28 1:19 ` Finn Thain
2009-10-28 6:54 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov [this message]
2009-10-28 16:38 ` Finn Thain
2009-11-06 8:38 ` Finn Thain
2009-11-06 8:59 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-11-10 4:07 ` Finn Thain
2009-11-10 4:20 ` Brad Boyer
2009-11-10 10:51 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-11-10 16:11 ` Finn Thain
2009-08-17 22:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-08-18 7:10 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-18 2:28 ` Brad Boyer
2009-08-18 7:07 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-18 23:40 ` Brad Boyer
2009-08-19 8:06 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-08-19 8:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-12-07 8:38 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-12-09 10:25 ` Klaus Kuehnhammer
2009-12-09 11:05 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
[not found] ` <DBFD40BF-19FC-47DF-8A7C-B71261AFBD85@parq.net>
[not found] ` <4B1F9492.6030604@codesourcery.com>
2009-12-09 15:44 ` Klaus Kuehnhammer
2009-12-10 9:18 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-12-11 14:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-12-11 16:23 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2009-12-17 17:53 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE7EAC2.8050409@codesourcery.com \
--to=maxim@codesourcery.com \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox