From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Kuvyrkov Subject: Re: m68k/for-2.6.34 Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:54:04 +0300 Message-ID: <4B6B33EC.9000102@codesourcery.com> References: <10f740e81002011212t91a087bkeb77dac23f5676e0@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: uClinux development list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <10f740e81002011212t91a087bkeb77dac23f5676e0@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: uclinux-dev-bounces@uclinux.org Errors-To: uclinux-dev-bounces@uclinux.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux/m68k , uClinux development list List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On 2/1/10 11:12 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: ... > Should I add the NPTL support for m68k and m68knommu, or shall I wait > for 2.6.35? Notwithstanding the bias, I think you should merge the NPTL support. The NPTL changes don't touch any of the existing functionality, they only add the new syscalls, so the risk of breaking something is negligible. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov CodeSourcery maxim@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x724 _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev