From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Kuvyrkov Subject: Re: m68k/for-2.6.34 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:27:12 +0300 Message-ID: <4B714690.5090200@codesourcery.com> References: <10f740e81002011212t91a087bkeb77dac23f5676e0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:58831 "EHLO mail.codesourcery.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753335Ab0BIL1Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:27:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <10f740e81002011212t91a087bkeb77dac23f5676e0@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Greg Ungerer , Linux/m68k , uClinux development list On 2/1/10 11:12 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: ... > If there's anything else in m68k-queue (or anyplace else :-) you > desperately want in 2.6.34, please let me know. Looking through the bug fixes I submitted while testing NPTL support, I noticed that I forgot the patches that address problems in signal handling for ColdFire. Namely, * Define sigcontext ABI for ColdFire * Fix m68k-uclinux's rt_sigreturn trampoline I just sent the updated patches against m68k/for-2.6.34 here . Can we include these into 2.6.34? Regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov CodeSourcery maxim@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x724