Re: Signal patchset (was: Re: aranym bug, manifests as "ida_remove called for id=13" on recent kernels)

Al Viro
2010-12-15T10:10:37Z

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Unless someone objects, I'm inclined to apply Al's patchset, as it improves the
> situation anyway.
>
> OK?

FWIW, there's an m68knommu counterpart (ACKed by gerg a while ago). The
entire bunch is on ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/viro/m68k-signals - both m68k
and m68knommu sets. I don't know how you guys would prefer it done, since
there's a trivial dependency between m68k and m68knommu parts of series -
the former has
+#ifndef __uClinux__
+#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
+#endif
in unistd.h and the latter does
-#ifndef __uClinux__
#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
-#endif
Both parts switch to generic sys_rt_sigsuspend(), for mmu and nommu resp.,
so they need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND defined as soon as conversion
is done. Other than that they are independent.