Re: Signal patchset

Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-01-06T20:42:51Z

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 14:23, Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com> wrote:
> On 15/12/10 20:10, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>>> Unless someone objects, I'm inclined to apply Al's patchset, as it
>>> improves the
>>> situation anyway.
>>>
>>> OK?
>>
>> FWIW, there's an m68knommu counterpart (ACKed by gerg a while ago).  The
>> entire bunch is on ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/viro/m68k-signals - both m68k
>> and m68knommu sets.  I don't know how you guys would prefer it done, since

Thx, good the know the nommu part is there, as I don't seem to have it
in my mailbox.

>> there's a trivial dependency between m68k and m68knommu parts of series -
>> the former has
>> +#ifndef __uClinux__
>> +#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
>> +#endif
>> in unistd.h and the latter does
>> -#ifndef __uClinux__
>>  #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
>> -#endif
>> Both parts switch to generic sys_rt_sigsuspend(), for mmu and nommu resp.,
>> so they need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND defined as soon as conversion
>> is done.  Other than that they are independent.
>
> I can make sure to send to Linus after Geert. Unless Geert you
> want to take and send both the m68k and m68knommu changes?

I can take the m68knommu changes with your ack, too.
I'll try to take a look at it tomorrow...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds