Re: Signal patchset

Greg Ungerer
2010-12-16T13:28:43Z

On 15/12/10 20:10, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> Unless someone objects, I'm inclined to apply Al's patchset, as it improves the
>> situation anyway.
>>
>> OK?
>
> FWIW, there's an m68knommu counterpart (ACKed by gerg a while ago). The
> entire bunch is on ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/viro/m68k-signals - both m68k
> and m68knommu sets. I don't know how you guys would prefer it done, since
> there's a trivial dependency between m68k and m68knommu parts of series -
> the former has
> +#ifndef __uClinux__
> +#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
> +#endif
> in unistd.h and the latter does
> -#ifndef __uClinux__
> #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
> -#endif
> Both parts switch to generic sys_rt_sigsuspend(), for mmu and nommu resp.,
> so they need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND defined as soon as conversion
> is done. Other than that they are independent.

I can make sure to send to Linus after Geert. Unless Geert you
want to take and send both the m68k and m68knommu changes?

Regards
Greg

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com