public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] m68k: merge and clean up files in m68k/lib
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:55:27 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9D35AF.3000009@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin1z7CMVdApJWtCQLyhVv-ZKAtT8A@mail.gmail.com>


Hi Geert,

On 07/04/11 05:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 20:41, Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@linux-m68k.org>  wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:58, Greg Ungerer<gerg@uclinux.org>  wrote:
>>> The following set of patches cleans up and merges individual files in
>>> the arch/m68k/lib directory. Mostly strait forward stuff,
>>>
>>> I have build and run tested on ARAnyM/Atari and ColdFire (non-mmu)
>>> targets.
>
>> Anyway, I did a thorough review, so consider it
>> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
> Upon actually trying it, I get:
>
> arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c:488: undefined reference to `strcpy'
> arch/m68k/q40/config.c:149: undefined reference to `strcpy'
> arch/m68k/atari/config.c:582: undefined reference to `strcpy'
> arch/m68k/atari/config.c:588: undefined reference to `strcpy'
> arch/m68k/atari/config.c:604: undefined reference to `strcpy'
> arch/m68k/mac/built-in.o:arch/m68k/mac/config.c:916: more undefined
> references to `strcpy' follow
>
> Some of these are sprintf() or strcat() calls, "optimized" into strcpy() by gcc
> (4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-21)). Should have thought about
> that, cfr. commit f9b07897c6288d7e5fc1fd004fccb0c5f1a0e570
> ("m68k: Uninline strchr()").
> But not all of them: some are real strcpy() calls. Why are they the
> inline version?

That does seem odd. One way or another strcpy is defined in
arch/m68k/include/asm/string.h. I would expect no real calls to
strcpy() after that. (And for me on my hand built gcc-4.5.1 I
don't end up with any).

At a guess the section for __GNUC__ > 4 must end up still trying
to use a real strcpy (presumably the __builtom_strcpy call) on
some versions of gcc.

#if __GNUC__ >= 4
#define strcpy(d, s)    (__builtin_constant_p(s) &&     \
                          __builtin_strlen(s) <= 32 ?    \
                          __builtin_strcpy(d, s) :       \
                          __kernel_strcpy(d, s))
#else
#define strcpy(d, s)    __kernel_strcpy(d, s)
#endif

Is there any reason we don't just drop the __GNUC__ >= 4 bit
and always just use __kernel_strcpy()?  After all kernel_strcpy
is a pretty tight optimized loop for m68k anyway.


> Reverting 7a2dc626ba38595bf04c663d834c394e7c0aa1f7 ("m68k: remove no
> longer used arch/m68k/lib/string.c") fixes this.
>
> So we need to keep at least the out-of-line strcpy().

Interestingly we haven't had a real strcpy defined on m68knommu
for quite a long time.

Regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close                             FAX:         +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-07  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-30  7:58 [PATCH 0/6] m68k: merge and clean up files in m68k/lib Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30  7:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] m68k: merge mmu and non-mmu versions of muldi3 Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30  7:58   ` [PATCH 2/6] m68k: merge mmu and non-mmu versions of lib/Makefile Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30  7:58   ` [PATCH 3/6] m68k: remove duplicate memmove() implementation Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30  7:58   ` [PATCH 4/6] m68k: remove duplicate memset() implementation Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30  7:58   ` [PATCH 5/6] m68k: remove duplicate memcpy() implementation Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30  7:58   ` [PATCH 6/6] m68k: remove no longer used arch/m68k/lib/string.c Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30 18:26     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-31  3:58       ` Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30 18:11   ` [PATCH 1/6] m68k: merge mmu and non-mmu versions of muldi3 Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-31  3:57     ` Greg Ungerer
2011-03-30 18:41 ` [PATCH 0/6] m68k: merge and clean up files in m68k/lib Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-31  4:01   ` Greg Ungerer
2011-04-06 19:36   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-07  3:55     ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2011-04-07  8:22       ` Andreas Schwab
2011-04-07 11:26         ` Greg Ungerer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D9D35AF.3000009@snapgear.com \
    --to=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox