From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Schmitz Subject: Re: [patch] m68k, mm: set all online nodes in N_NORMAL_MEMORY Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:05:15 +1200 Message-ID: <4DB3AF8B.6020105@gmail.com> References: <1303317178.2587.30.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110421220351.9180.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4DB3840F.3060503@gmail.com> <4DB3A09A.70308@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:48665 "EHLO mail-px0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751316Ab1DXFFR (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:05:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DB3A09A.70308@gmail.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Schmitz Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , David Rientjes , Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , Roman Zippel , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, "tg@mirbsd.de >> Thorsten Glaser" Michael Schmitz wrote: > Besides, your solution would set N_HIGH_MEMORY not N_NORMAL_MEMORY if > I read free_area_init_nodes() right. Does that matter? check_for_regular_memory() does take care of that - so it would be all the same in the end. Whether it's worth it for a handful of nodes at best I'm unsure. I'll leave that for Geert to decide. Cheers, Michael