From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Schmitz Subject: Re: [patch] m68k, mm: set all online nodes in N_NORMAL_MEMORY Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:41:35 +1200 Message-ID: <4DB4DF5F.809@gmail.com> References: <1303317178.2587.30.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110421220351.9180.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4DB3840F.3060503@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:61757 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758021Ab1DYClr (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:41:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Thorsten Glaser Cc: Michael Schmitz , KOSAKI Motohiro , David Rientjes , Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , Roman Zippel , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org Hello Thorsten, >> Tested on my ARAnyM test setup so far. I'd like to wait for an indep= endent >> kernel image built by Thorsten before I test on the actual hardware.= Sorry but >> you'll have to restart your build Thorsten :-) >> =20 > > Heh okay, if you want. But only cross-compiling :D > =20 Thought so. That's fine actually. Your cross toolchain will be a lot=20 more recent than mine. > > KOSAKI Motohiro dixit: > > =20 >> I think you are right. however I doubt m68k need to care memoryless = node check. >> probably following patch just work. >> =20 > > That=E2=80=99s what we have now. Compiles, boots, works fine. > > > So, which of these do you guys want? > =20 Whatever is cleaner and easier to understand. I'm a poor judge of code=20 elegance. Cheers, Michael