public inbox for linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] m68knommu: create config options for CPU classes
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:35:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E029876.6040507@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikuR5tNe=CQS9qCOJHGkKUWKmO-rw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On 03/06/11 21:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 08:43,<gerg@snapgear.com>  wrote:
>> From: Greg Ungerer<gerg@uclinux.org>
>>
>> There are 3 families of CPU core types that we support in the m68knommu
>> architecture branch. They are
>>
>> . traditional 68000
>> . CPU32 (which is a 68020 core derivitive without MMU)
>
> derivative ... and without bitfield instructions.
>
>> . ColdFire
>
>> It will be useful going forward to have a CONFIG_ option defined for
>> each type. We already have one for ColdFire (CONFIG_COLDFIRE), so add
>> for the other 2 families, CONFIG_M68000 and CONFIG_MCPU32.
>
> I'm wondering whether it would help to have Kconfig symbols for the
> instruction capabilities as well.
> Then you have to document these capabilities in the kconfig definition only,
> and can use single (e.g.) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_BITFIELDS tests everywhere
> else, instead of duplicating the logic at every #ifdef.

I have just posted a modified version of the bitops.h merge that
creates and uses a CONFIG_CPU_HAS_BITFIELDS option. The patch is
otherwise the same in terms of changes, just uses this define
for the ifdefs.

If you/others prefer this we can run with this one.

Regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close                             FAX:         +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-23  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-03  6:43 [PATCH 0/2] m68knommu: fix cpu optimization conditionals gerg
2011-06-03  6:43 ` gerg
2011-06-03  6:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] m68knommu: create config options for CPU classes gerg
2011-06-03 11:15   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-06  1:49     ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-10  3:56     ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-12  9:36       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-23  1:35     ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2011-06-03  6:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] m68k: use kernel processor defines for conditional optimizations gerg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E029876.6040507@snapgear.com \
    --to=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox