From: jdow <jdow@earthlink.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Partitions: Amiga RDB partition on 2 TB disk way too big, while OK in AmigaOS 4.1
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:09:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDE55A0.50804@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVEq3RrQVJF9RgyC7UH-VAcWK=9FVvOs5Hf9X1gzv8UvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012/06/17 14:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Joanne,
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:06 PM, jdow <jdow@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> I've asked Martin for a digital copy of his RDBs and what he thinks the
>> partition(s) should look like. I should also be told whether the disk
>> is supposed to be solely Amiga OSs or not. I gather it's not.
>
> His RDB is attached to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43521
I want the raw binary on the blocks 0 through the end of the RDBs or
128 blocks, which ever comes first. I don't see that there. I just
see the amiga-fdisk printout of it. With the actual binary I can
parse it myself and see what comes out.
(As a side note - RDBs work with large sector sizes. They pretty much
always have.)
...
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
{^_^}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-17 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-17 6:41 Partitions: Amiga RDB partition on 2 TB disk way too big, while OK in AmigaOS 4.1 Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-17 10:50 ` jdow
2012-06-17 12:58 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-17 16:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-17 21:06 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-17 21:58 ` jdow
2012-06-18 21:14 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-17 22:27 ` jdow
2012-06-17 21:06 ` jdow
2012-06-17 21:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-17 22:09 ` jdow [this message]
2012-06-17 21:20 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-17 22:17 ` jdow
2012-06-18 1:28 ` jdow
2012-06-19 19:46 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-18 20:39 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-18 20:58 ` jdow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-17 8:33 Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-17 10:53 ` jdow
2012-06-17 12:51 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDE55A0.50804@earthlink.net \
--to=jdow@earthlink.net \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).