From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Ungerer Subject: Re: m68k: five unused boards in Kconfig.machine Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:43:50 +1000 Message-ID: <514FF226.3050507@uclinux.org> References: <1363868258.1390.129.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1363868258.1390.129.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Bolle Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Hi Paul, On 21/03/13 22:17, Paul Bolle wrote: > 0) These five Kconfig entries in arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine are entirely > unused: > config UC5272 > config UC5282 > config SOM5282EM > config COBRA5329 > config SNAPGEAR > > 1) I think that these can be removed. But I recall from an earlier > thread (in 2011) that Greg wanted to keep SOM5282EM: > Although it isn't used inside the code it does let the configurer > know that this specific board is supported. > > 2) Would it be acceptable to remove these five Kconfig entries but add > text to the prompts or the help strings of some other entries to > indicate support? I have been moving the underlying code to be more generic in its support of various ColdFire boards. I am a lot more comfortable now removing the specific board names if we really don't have anything specific keyed on them. Regards Greg