From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:23:21 -0700
Message-ID: <52640379.8070609@roeck-us.net>
References: <lsq.1378608720.401499712@decadent.org.uk>	 <522C22DB.9080008@roeck-us.net>	 <CAMuHMdW6TGdfi+FH=hRWY_hhs5Cb5N9xV1OL0O9Dcs+PfXm2xA@mail.gmail.com>	 <522CAB38.2010909@roeck-us.net> <1382270174.2794.96.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:62866 "EHLO
	mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751285Ab3JTQXb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:23:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1382270174.2794.96.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>

On 10/20/2013 04:56 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>>> m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section
>>>> `.note.gnu.build-id'
>>>
>>> I can't seem to find an explicit fix for that since v3.2.
>>> Perhaps the fix is a side effect of f84f52a5c15db7d14a534815f27253b001735183
>>> ("m68knommu: clean up linker script").
>>>
>>
>> Kind of. Turns out it requires the following patches.
>>
>> 40c1b9cf (m68k: consolidate the vmlinux.lds linker scripts)
>> ed865e31 (m68k: use non-MMU linker script for ColdFire MMU builds)
>> f84f52a5 (m68knommu: clean up linker script)
>>
>> With those patches applied, all my m68k builds (mmu and nommu) pass with 3.2.
>
> I've queued these up for 3.2.  The first looks quite a big change in
> terms of lines, but most of that is just renaming a file so I think it's
> within the spirit of the stable rules.  The third is also pretty big as
> m68knommu seems so broken in 3.2 that I suppose it is OK.
>
> Ben.
>
Hi Ben,

is that in your patch list yet ? Just wondering, because the latest nommu build still failed.

Thanks,
Guenter