From: schmitz <schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] hardirq: Make hardirq bits generic
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:44:15 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5281EA5F.3080604@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55642d365fc4272c4f43a88ea435e360@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Thomas,
>
>>
>> If you look at the probability of the first two checks catching
>> anything, then it's pretty low. Most interrupts returns go through
>> ret_from_exception. Yes, I added counters which prove that at least on
>> the aranym, but I doubt that it will make a real difference if you run
>> this on real hardware.
>
> I'm happy to try that (indeed, verify your patch works on Atari
> hardware first) - I trust the patch is relative to m68k git, not your
> previous patches?
Pleased to report the patch works, as expected, on the actual hardware.
I doubt we still need to profile the interrupt return path, Geert?
Cheers,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130917082838.218329307@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20130917182350.449685712@linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20130917183628.534494408@linutronix.de>
2013-09-17 20:00 ` [patch 1/6] hardirq: Make hardirq bits generic Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-17 21:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-18 14:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 15:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-09-19 17:02 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-09-19 18:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-20 9:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-04 12:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-04 19:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-06 17:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-07 14:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-07 16:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-10 8:49 ` Michael Schmitz
2013-11-10 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-11 14:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-11 19:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-11 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-12 6:56 ` Michael Schmitz
2013-11-12 8:44 ` schmitz [this message]
2013-11-12 15:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-13 19:42 ` [tip:irq/urgent] m68k: Simplify low level interrupt handling code tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-12 14:09 ` [patch 1/6] hardirq: Make hardirq bits generic Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-11 19:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2013-11-12 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5281EA5F.3080604@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
--to=schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox