Re: [PATCH 0/2] m68k: propose move of platform coldfire

[Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>]

Hi Geert,

On 21/08/14 17:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:04 AM,  <gerg@uclinux.org> wrote:
>> I propose that we move the arch/m68k/platform/coldfire directory to be
>> directly under arch/m68k.
>>
>> The current platform/ structure was inhereted from the move of m68knommu,
>> and is inconsistent with the existing m68k platforms (each having a
>> directory under arch/m68k).
>>
>> Moving platform/coldfire is quite strait forward. The following patches do a
>> move, and fix up the broken pathname comments.
> That sounds fine to me.
>
>> This does leave the question of what to do with the other directories still
>> under arch/m68k/platform, namely 68000 and 68360. Should they be moved in
>> the same way as coldfire?
> I think the 68*328 and 68360 SoC support can have their own directories,
> as these are platforms.
>
> However, these directories also contain 68000 and 68360 CPU support,
> which we may want to share with other platforms in the future, to support
> 68000-based Amigas, Ataris, Macs, Suns, ...
>
> But as that's a problem to fix when someone is working on it, it's fine
> for me to move these one level up, too.

Thanks for the feedback. I'll prepare patches that move these too then.

Regards
Greg