From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen Gang Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch: Kconfig: Let all architectures set endian explicitly Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:38:39 +0800 Message-ID: <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> References: <53ECE9DD.80004@gmail.com> <20140814180418.GA20777@linux-mips.org> <53ED34CE.3040001@gmail.com> <53EDCC60.5040608@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:48808 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751946AbaHXIeW (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 04:34:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <53EDCC60.5040608@gmail.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Arnd Bergmann , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, vgupta@synopsys.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Jean Delvare , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, egtvedt@samfundet.no, realmz6@gmail.com, msalter@redhat.com, a-jacquiot@ti.com, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, rkuo@codeaurora.org, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, takata@linux-m32r.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, Michal Simek , yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com, jonas@southpole.se, jejb@parisc-linux.org, deller@gmx.de, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, Martin Schwidefsky , heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, Liqin Chen Hello Maintainers: Is this patch OK? If it pass basic checking, please let me know, and I shall try to make another related patch for KBuild (I can do nothing related with Kbuild, before get confirmation for this patch). Thanks. On 8/15/14 17:01, Chen Gang wrote: > > > On 8/15/14 6:14, Chen Gang wrote: >> On 08/15/2014 02:04 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: >>> >> >> OK, thanks, I assumes when support both endian, the default choice is >> CPU_BIG_ENDIAN, although no default value for choice (originally, I did >> worry about it). >> >>> So I think you can just drop the MIPS segment from your patch. >>> >> >> If what I assumes is correct, what you said sounds reasonable to me. >> >> > > So for me, it is harmless to add CPU_*_ENDIAN explicitly, and can let > other members don't need think of. > > By the way, for sh, it is almost the same case, except it contents the > default value, for me, it is clear enough, so I skip sh architecture in > this patch. > > > Thanks > -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed