Re: [PATCH RFC] m68k: skip kernel premption if interrupts were disabled

Finn Thain
2024-03-26T00:40:50Z

On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, Michael Schmitz wrote:

> The set_fc warning is specific to 040 but the bad kernel buserror (null
> pointer) causing it isn't.

I'm curious as to what happens if we just ignore the error and continue
stress testing. You're right though -- we don't need an '030 for that
(it's a non-fatal error).

> But testing on 030 would be a good idea if you have one with enough RAM.

My LC III has 36 MB which is sufficient for stress-ng. I will try it.