From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sfjro@users.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] aufs: Do not refer to AUFS_NAME in pr_fmt Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:04:12 +0900 Message-ID: <5496.1325469852@jrobl> References: <1325264773.13595.133.camel@deadeye> <9569.1325306817@jrobl> Return-path: Received: from mail01-md.ns.itscom.net ([175.177.155.111]:33087 "EHLO mail01-md.ns.itscom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751054Ab2ABCEQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2012 21:04:16 -0500 Received: from scan05-mds.s.noc.itscom.net (scan05-md.ns.itscom.net [175.177.155.100]) by mail01-md-outgoing.ns.itscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C15D9E04B7 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 11:04:12 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Ben Hutchings , aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net, Thorsten Glaser , Debian kernel team , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven: > If the Makefile refers to the macro, perhaps the Makefile should > define it, and pass it with -D? ?? Instead of defining it in Makefile, "-imacros linux/aufs_name.h" is added. Or do you mean -imacros is useless? J. R. Okajima