From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9307C77B7A for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240365AbjFMHau (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 03:30:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33250 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240203AbjFMHas (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 03:30:48 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 602 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:30:35 PDT Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (luna.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D511B0 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AE5A6F4D58; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:20:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Steigerwald To: debian-68k , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: linux-m68k , Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: Status of affs support in the kernel and affstools Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:20:29 +0200 Message-ID: <5947812.lOV4Wx5bFT@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=martin smtp.mailfrom=martin@lichtvoll.de Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org John Paul Adrian Glaubitz - 13.06.23, 08:47:11 CEST: > I was wondering what the current status of the affs driver in the > kernel is, did it receive the fixes that Michael(?) was working on? I > vaguely remember there were some issues with larger filesystems or so > and that someone was working on fixing these issues. Well I just searched for the large size fixing patches discussed on linux-m68k mailing list under subject titles "Amiga RDB partition support fixes": While I found a steady stream of fixes for affs, including related to Amiga permission bit handling, quite recent fixes, even in 2023, I did not found that size fixing patch. I recalled a discussion where Michael Schmitz talked to Jens Axboe after I asked whether the patch got in on 2023-08-21. I thought back then it would have went in, but maybe the last question asked by Jens Axboe did not get answered? At least I did not found the patch in git history. Maybe I made a mistake during search. I will reply to the other thread and ask again. Maybe it was just a last question / answer round missing. Or maybe someone else can confirm that the patch indeed went in. Best, -- Martin