From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E2682D90 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.149 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712268955; cv=none; b=IoPg3KEXHRsqOwaxk7vTMrImxDdHCVWbqh4p538+ZPQ49W8ABXznQQdCVHP2eOBPvPR830PWiKt+THyWElHOExGN2wIRaccQyobg/BvmGzW/gmibXFgAA9rDrWT6CcltIY4GUvLMok5QNz873xVSFjx7afkKwVKRqsVBZYwFV7A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712268955; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pTp5edkZdZb3eEOWCrTxXu87gsPr0RabVB3/ii9vNkw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QNL80t3Rk2hBjiwoPpdNuoEoE9j7aU75ZwA25mCwD3LjBW97CjrcyUhidBoV3kASyhdYkuJKsH8BfqNL9GGNhD+Y6sF087UqJY2t6JlVkGa06cPakYRfCxkYQH6LzWc8VSX2Oa3G1IPoY6QxDwAtBRgMchmGZIx8s8KPcLth8Z4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-m68k.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Jw1DfUkh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.149 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Jw1DfUkh" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFB913800B8; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:15:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:15:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1712268951; x=1712355351; bh=2BjsJg1F1jsrIqkTlwXi7zvS9Quc 1lTtGbFTjSTDfA4=; b=Jw1DfUkhxICYlaH25P8sNWWfmviY9fTgQD1YAkM+b7J5 MLDoXeSGk6Ppi2vjNecFMnDMVAWH3cOI51tY25oyukCw05gCNvfiUFjjdFECZNKa m6kmayGHiHqRDj+AaubmnhfiCBKbgp2EmGoAOKgnyeAbKRBH5uvrTSwHI0OfjCwQ sZh1VGtktjiIk6Q4UAII8BrPseCAW5jBPLkOcHDgMsoDrbctl0ul4GLZPzSG5ny8 mmslf+tCky2hCQa0gvjwvW1FFj6Ec3CgKxiQvwc14ovTWKx/Vzmm0GWlRDGYB8L6 J2450RXPLz9cVmVP+dLv4twnNIQ7ApXzz/femDFrSA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudefledgtdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevufgjkfhfgggtsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefhihhnnhcu vfhhrghinhcuoehfthhhrghinheslhhinhhugidqmheikehkrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeelueehleehkefgueevtdevteejkefhffekfeffffdtgfejveekgeefvdeu heeuleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hfthhhrghinheslhhinhhugidqmheikehkrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i58a146ae:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:17:27 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: Andy Shevchenko cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , "Naveen N. Rao" , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <5dd285bd-b9a8-c85c-9bd9-a839c10e78fd@linux-m68k.org> References: <8f234f26-d5e3-66ed-ab0c-86d3c9852b4a@linux-m68k.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > --- > > > (here is a good location for Cc:) > > > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should > > be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this > > convention changed recently? > > I see, I will prepare a patch to discuss this aspect. > If you are going to veto patches on the basis of rules yet unwritten, I think you risk turning the kernel development process into a lottery. How many other patches presently under review will need to be dropped just in case they don't conform with possible future rules?