Re: [PATCH v2 00/41] RPCSEC GSS krb5 enhancements

Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-27T15:37:21Z

Hi Chuck,

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:06 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 27, 2023, at 4:51 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:52 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:19 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 23, 2023, at 10:16 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >>> Unable to handle kernel access at virtual address af06da84
> >>
> >>>> I.e. a slightly different crash.
> >>>> As the difference between the two crashes is modular vs. builtin,
> >>>> this looks like an out-of-bound access in the test.
> >
> > Just ran it on physical arm32 and arm64 (Renesas APE6EVM and
> > Salvator-XS), and the test crashes there, too.
> >
> >>> Why not run the test suite just as I suggested?
> >
> > kunit_kernel.ConfigError: m68k is not a valid arch, options are
> > ['alpha', 'arm', 'arm64', 'i386', 'powerpc', 'riscv', 's390', 'sparc',
> > 'x86_64']
> >
> > Will look into adding m68k support ;-)
> >
> > But the issue can easily be reproduced using
> > ".../tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=arm
> > --cross_compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --raw_output=all --kunitconfig
> > ./net/sunrpc/.kunitconfig" on current upstream[1]:

> I'm still not able to reproduce:
>
> [cel@bazille odd-releases]$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=arm
> --cross_compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf- --raw_output=all --kunitconfig
> ./net/sunrpc/.kunitconfig
> [10:04:14] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
> Generating .config ...
> Populating config with:
> $ make ARCH=arm O=.kunit olddefconfig
> [10:04:18] Building KUnit Kernel ...
> Populating config with:
> $ make ARCH=arm O=.kunit olddefconfig
> Building with:
> $ make ARCH=arm O=.kunit --jobs=4
> ERROR:root:gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option ‘-mabi=aapcs-linux’
> gcc: note: valid arguments to ‘-mabi=’ are: ms sysv
> gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option ‘-mabi=aapcs-linux’
> gcc: note: valid arguments to ‘-mabi=’ are: ms sysv
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mlittle-endian’
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mlittle-endian’
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mtp=cp15’
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mtp=cp15’
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mfpu=vfp’
> make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:252: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mfpu=vfp’
> make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:114: scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [/home/cel/src/linux/odd-releases/Makefile:1297: prepare0] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:242: __sub-make] Error 2
>
> -bash: --cross_compile=arm-linux-gnueabihf-: command not found
> -bash: ./net/sunrpc/.kunitconfig: Permission denied
> [cel@bazille odd-releases]$ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 12.2.1 20221121 (Red Hat 12.2.1-4)
> Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
> [cel@bazille odd-releases]$
>
> What am I missing?

Please run that as a single command, not split across 3 lines.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds